For the Multi-modal communities with having large populations with surrounding rural areas, in conjunction with the increases of aging baby-boomers, disabled communities, the health benefits of these communities to continue to network, stay active in the remaining life span, while the aging infrastructure of major metropolitan areas are weighted with other costs, including the burdens of transporting these same communities of the population from surrounding rural areas:Where feasible-Route paratransit services in the most dense portions of cities, in order to extend door to door paratransit services in outlying areas. Then, in large Cities some wheelchair users will be able to make it to their nearby fixed route or paratransit stops because of improved sidewalk areas, whereas other people with disabilities are not able to do so, or people living in outlying areas with unimproved sidewalk areas. There does need to be a mutual agreement, if the person with the disability, however mobile, can make it to that stop, is guaranteed that transit, must suffice provide that transit be able to accommodate all people with disabilities as needed. There should be no reason a wheelchair user that is able to get from house to sidewalk to stop for paratransit, cannot do so, while a person with a disability that cannot is denied paratransit because of not being able to ride a bus, but can make it to the stop. We do have a rapidly aging population, where engineers are designing multi-modal communities, walkable, stickable, and wheelable are the future where access is truly equal.
Voting on Ideas
Vote for your favorite ideas by clicking on the up arrow.To undo an upvote, simply click the arrow again. This second click removes your vote.